Casualties of War

I've slacked hard on this month's war challenge, but I deemed it necessary to watch one of my favorite Brian De Palma movies. This one is based on a grizzly true story of a group of grieving soldiers who kidnap a local Vietnamese girl and proceed to torture and rape her.

The cast is excellent. Sean Penn is the main perpetrator of this heinous act. A man with seemingly no conscience as he views any natives as VC scum who deserve whatever harm they may get. Don Harvey plays his asshole lackey who you want to punch in the face. John C. Reilly is the guy who's too dumb to realize the error of his ways, and John Leguizamo plays the quiet reluctant culprit who's roped into the dirty deeds because Sean Penn is an intimidating fuck.

The only guy who wants nothing to do with any of this is Michael J. Fox, who plays the voice of reason, but he can't do much of anything because these guys are his commanding officers. This whole ordeal is a nightmare for him, leading him to question his morals and purpose in the war, since the good guys prove to be no better than the men they're fighting a war against.

This movie is rather hard to watch, because the girl really sells it, and you feel awful for what they put her through. It's emotionally devastating and downbeat, made even worse by the fact that it's true. War is tough enough when you're trying to do what's right, but here we have a bunch of soldiers knowingly doing the wrong thing.

It's hard-hitting, and if it doesn't get a reaction out of you, then you're fucked.

Also featuring Erik King (Doakes, from Dexter), Ving Rhames, and real life Nam vet Captain Dale Dye. Too bad Michael J. Fox doesn't do much these days, due to his health, because he put out one hell of a performance in this.

2019 War Movie Challenge

It's the 75th Anniversary of the D-Day landings, so what better way to commemorate them than a challenge for the month of July. The challenge will commence at 00:01 GMT on the 1st July and finish at 06:00 GMT on the 1st August.

Points will be awarded for running time, so with most war movies clocking in at well over two hours, you should be able to rack up the points. You can also watch any TV series, including documentaries if you missed out this month (The World At War comes highly recommended).

The general rule will be: the movie or TV series has to be tagged with "war" on either IMDb or Wiki. The movie or TV series does not have to include scenes of combat and can just be set during the war (i.e. Casablanca) as long as the war is integral to the development of the plot, whether it is in the foreground or the background of the story.

Horror movies set during real wars or campaigns will be permitted, as long as there is at least one scene of combat (i.e. Overlord). But no, something like Dead Snow would not count despite the Nazi theme.

Although they will not be tagged with "war" on IMDb, I will also permit fictional wars so that will include fantasy (i.e. The Lord of the Rings, Game of Thrones) or science fiction (i.e. Aliens, Starship Troopers), but bare in mind there is a challenge for these genres coming up later in September I believe, so try to stick to real world history!

So sign up now (no pun intended)!

Disturbing movies to show to young women

A few female coworkers have been watching movies at my place lately. I'm trying to educate them on good movies. Currently, the goal is to show them something disturbing, to mess them up.

I figured "Bug" 2006 would be a good place to start, but it didn't phase them so much. I'm thinking of whipping out the big guns, and showing them something like "Megan is Missing". I was creeped the fuck out by that movie, so that's my best idea for a disturbing movie.

What would you show to someone if you wanted to really unnerve them?

Just when you thought I couldn't sink any lower...

Now, I'm a goddamn pizza guy!

My life is hilarious.



Granted, I only worked one shift of pizza hut at my current theater job, but still. A fucking pizza guy.

Amelia Kinkade (Angela from NotD)

I am watching Night of the Demons 1988 for the fifty kajillionth time, and I just want to say, I really want to track the actress down and chainsaw her head off because of the way she says "Oh!" very insultingly, at 23:15 here:


OK, now that I got that out of my system... I looked at her IMDB page, and apparently she does a lot of work with animals, and tries to help head off possible future animal poachers in Africa by reaching out to them when they're young and getting them to have empathy. So, OK, I guess she turned out cool. She's off the hook. Her neck will not have a close encounter with my chainsaw. A very close call for Amelia Kinkade. I now return you all to your regularly scheduled lives.

Seriously though, the way she talked at that moment was really odious, and makes me mad. I need to not watch that scene on days when I've had more than twenty cappucinos. It makes me very angry.

Deep Fakes always existed in 2019

Has anybody seen the viddie where they put Jim Carrey into The Shining? It's incredible how far technology has come, and it's also incredibly scary. This stuff can and will compromise the integrity of surveillance footage. It's only a matter of time before a grand conspiracy occurs involving this stuff, but is it new? Haven't we all been faked out for decades?

Shortly after the Shining video, we went back to the 90s for a T2 redux with Stallone's face on Arnold's body. I read that this was actually the idea for Face/Off with Travolta and Cage, and it's much more believable to two beefcakes who have a similar body type than it was for Cage/Travolta, but that movie wasn't bad either way.

So photoshop is definitely a thing, and it's much more easy to believe that someone doctored an image rather than a video, but we can go back a few years further... Back to the future... and with Arnold again... in... The Running Man!


Made in 1987 (one of the greatest years of cinematic history), The Running Man was set in the distant future of 2019, just like Blade Runner, only much more believable. We didn't have flying cars and replicants in this dystopian future. Just a few interactive game shows and bad fashions.

So there's a bit in the later half of the movie where Arnold's face is digitally put onto a double's body for a fight with Jesse Ventura. This deep fake is a bit more advanced than our current tech, because they were able to capture and impose his Austrian accent, and they pulled no punches with their body double when Ventura impales him into a spiked wall.



So much talk about deep fakes lately, but they're nothing new! After all, this is the future!

Wicked World (1991) - Could this be the next THINGS?

"A Barry J. Gillis Film" is already selling me.



You got to love how his trailers feature titties in them. You also got to love how it takes nearly 30 years to get this piece of shit on video. I'll be keeping my eyes peeled for this turkey.

What movies did you buy or watch this week? (7-21)

The Gingerbread Man (Blu-ray)
Con Air (Blu-ray)
Lust for a Vampire (Blu-ray)

Also about to preorder Who Saw her Die? and Alice Sweet Alice, both on Blu-ray.

Marvel can suck my nuts

They announced their phase 4 plans, and it all has me rolling my eyes.

Doctor Strange: In the Multiverse of Madness is being called the first MCU horror film. As if! PG-13 horror is not horror. Provided the director has done a few horror films, you know they're gonna puss out and make it into a regular fantasy extravaganza. Honestly, the first Doctor Strange movie was pretty damn cool, but call a spade a spade. Don't lie to us and tell us you're making a horror movie out of a kid-friendly property. They tried this with X-Men: New Mutants, but what happened to that movie? Despite getting great reviews from early screenings, they pussed right the fuck out and decided to reshoot the entire movie, and that was almost 3 years ago! And there's still no sign of this movie ever coming out, because Marvel and Horror don't want to co-exist, because then all the little kiddies can't see it.

Speaking of horror-related stuff, we're supposed to get a new Blade movie. Now, Wesley Snipes has been begging them for nearly 10 years to let him do another Blade movie, and they've been talking and teasing him that whole time, only to say no and give it to another actor who was already in the MCU. Well, I guess the netflix stuff, originally proposed to be in the MCU, isn't in the MCU because they're trying to pretend that shit doesn't exist anymore, even though it was hardcore and awesome.

Next, we got some "diversity" bullshit, since Natalie Portman is going to be the new Thor, and The Eternals is going to have some LGBTQ shit. Plus, it'll have Angelina Jolie, so count me out. That lady creeps me out.

And even with their anxious effort to buy FOX, they still don't have any plans for X-Men. They pressured the X-Men series to end with that shitty Dark Phoenix movie, and they aren't even doing anything with that property? They can go fuck themselves.

Marvel should have quit after Endgame. Instead, they're making shows about their lame characters like Hawkeye, Falcon & Bucky, and Scarlet Witch? Who cares about those turkeys. Who cares about any of this shit!

Halloween Kills (2020) and Halloween Ends (2021)

I told myself I only had to stay alive long enough to see Halloween 2018 as well as the upcoming Terminator movie, but those bastards at Blumhouse gave me another two somethings to look forward to. The same team from the last movie is coming back for some back-to-back horror in Haddonfield, so does anybody have any speculations?

Obviously, it comes as little surprise that Michael survives his 2018 outing. How he does this is beyond me, because SPOILERS... that damn cellar was secure. Laurie was a paranoid survivalist who undoubtedly went over every inch of that basement to make sure that her assailant wouldn't be able to escape, but those screenwriters can write themselves out of any corner.

Wouldn't it be funny if the new movie was a direct sequel to the original, again? More SPOILERS... how's Michael going to properly wield his knife if he's missing a few fingers now? The obvious answer is with his other hand, but still... Will he be badly burned again, like he was in the original Halloween II? Will his mask and outfit survive, or will he have to find another? These are the hardest obstacles in making another sequel. Once we get through this shit... the rest is gravy.


Whatever they end up doing ought to be fun either way. As long as you have a good actor behind that mask, Jamie Lee in defense mode, John Carpenter making that music, and loads of atmosphere, people will eat that shit up. I know I will.