No new notifications.

๐Ÿ“ My Feed

โœ๏ธ Add Post


Post Content 1000
 
Markup  

๐Ÿ–Š๏ธ Markup


Posts and comments support the following markup:

  • **bold**
  • *italic*
  • ~~strikethrough~~
  • [u]underline[/u]
  • [color=red]red text[/color]
  • @username (limit 10)
  • #hashtag (limit 10)

๐Ÿ‘๏ธ Preview



The tit patrol, that's who! ๐ŸŒ โš ๏ธ NSFW
Angela Baker Is A Dick, Now!

image

Can't a Horror film ever just be SO good that it's above having sequels? No, it can't. The better a movie is, the more of a chance it has of gaining a following. And the more of a following it has, the more of a chance there is of at least one sequel being made. Call it greed, call it smart. It can be annoying. Not always, but we've all been annoyed once or twice after hearing of plans to follow up on a story that needs no follow up. Most of these are nothing more than obvious cash-grabs which offer nothing new, but some, you know the ones, just plain don't need to exist. From a fan's standpoint, I mean. Some sequels may even manage to ruin the original for some. Or so they say. That's not exactly where I'm going with this, though. I'm not saying I hated Sleepaway Camp II and III enough for it to affect my feelings on the original. I don't even hate them at all, really. There's actually nothing wrong with either movie, considering they're nothing more than late 80's Slashers. BUT do they really need to be Sleepaway Camp sequels? Does Pamela Springsteen really have any business playing older, more hypocritical Angela Baker? You know what? Don't answer that...

image OK, then. Absolutely anything is fair game, even if the original director or none of the actors are available. Point taken. I guess all one can do is something different at this point. And that is absolutely what we get with 1988's Sleepaway Camp II. A Slasher sequel which comes off more like a light parody of all the Camp Slashers of the day. One could say it's more like an example of certain people not giving a shit about continuity or anything that made the original great. Certain people who were probably hoping all the Horror fans would just shut up and have fun with it. Ugh... Fine!

image Let's just forget everything we would expect from Angela Baker, five years removed. The creators of this movie basically start from scratch, and not so much replace the character, but rather redefine it. That's where Pamela Springsteen comes in. Pamela is a new kind of Angela Baker. An Angela who has left the past behind. No longer will she let her penis make her feel inferior. No longer will she let past tragedies and a questionable upbringing drive her to murder. I mean, Angela still murders... ALOT, but it's mainly when someone annoys her. Plus, she does now seem fully aware that it's actually happening. If nothing else, that is a step in the right direction.

image Due to there being practically no story, here, I feel no obligation to get too specific, but this film is about a super-positive yet irritable camp counselor, who is obsessed with providing the perfect summer for everyone. However, in her eyes, the perfect summer is impossible if everyone isn't being perfect. I'm not sure when Angela decided she had the right to hold everyone to the highest possible standards, but considering her past, Angela Baker has a lot of nerve, acting like that. Nevermind her present. Anyone who gets out of line, breaks the rules, or just gets on Angela's nerves, gets "sent home". Or atleast that's her story. Angela has been killing again, and unlike that last killing spree, she seems to be having a lot of fun with this one. Will Angela still be having fun once she realizes she's killed literally everyone, this time? 5/10

image Why do these movies always come in 2s? Basket Case 2 and 3, Toxic Avenger 2 and 3. You know what I mean. And naturally, Sleepaway Camp II would also lead to an even more pointless companion piece. Good God, why, though? Because 1989. That's why! They even went the extra mile and gave Angela some blonde highlights because she just wasn't already different enough from Felissa Rose. While, in all fairness, a disguise isn't the worst idea in the world after that shit she pulled last year. In fact, if it's still an option for Angela to change back into her original form, now might be a good time. Instead, Angela murders some girl and steals her identity. Whatever works, I guess.

image Maybe those mean girls from the original movie were right. Maybe Angela isn't that bright, after all. Or maybe the writers just weren't all that creative because Angela immediately does the one thing that a killer should never do: She heads back to the scene of the crimes. Without hesitation, Angela jumps on a bus and heads back to Camp Rolling Hills, now known as Camp New Horizons. At this new camp, we find there is some kind of program for teenagers going on. "An experiment in sharing", they call it. Pairing up dickish rich kids with pissed off, inner-city thugs, I guess, to ruin their weekend. All the kids are named after Brady Bunch siblings, and the people running the show are Herman and Lily. No, really! Herman and Lily! Herman is played by that one guy from Bonnie And Clyde who seems to look more and more like a child molester, the older he gets. Well, I just thought that needed to be pointed out. Unlike in part 2, though, Angela seems to have decided that everyone is going to get it before they can even do anything to piss her off. How very "Jason" of her.

image Unfortunately for Angela, there's also a cop hanging around. A cop who had a son who was decapitated around here about a year ago. He knows who did it, and when he finds her, he's going to blow her head off. Of course, he's going to have to find her, first. Thank goodness for bleach, eh? Angela will worry about him, later. Right now, there are some very annoying teenagers who need to be brutally murdered in the most creative ways possible. Some of them casually use racist terms. Some, only when provoked, some are just in the way. What I find strange about this movie is that, while Angela does seem to be killing more for fun, this time, these teenagers actually seem far more deserving than those from last year. Pretty much everyone in this movie deserves to die... besides the obvious. 4/10

So, what would be better titles for these movies? Sorry. Sleepaway Camp II and III aren't cutting it for me. There are only two, in my opinion: The one with the twist and the one with the fat piece of shit. I don't know. Any generic title would do. These movies aren't anything special, but they're entertaining enough to not need to ride the coat tails of a good movie. And they're certainly better than any other slashers that were coming out at the time. So, never let it be said that I never said anything positive about these bastard sequels. I will say this, though. I've never seen the point in bringing back the character of Angela without the original actress. Especially when replaced with someone who looks/is nothing like her, but if that's not an Elephant in the room to you, then, that's great. While I do like Pamela Springsteen and these movies (mildly), sorry. Not buying it. Never will.

image

#Review
+5

๐Ÿ“ Reply to Post


  1000

๐Ÿ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Trash Person ๐ŸŒ โš ๏ธ NSFW
Housewife (2017) - from the director of Baskin

Housewife (2017) (Turkish Horror)

Haunted by a horrific childhood trauma for 20 years, a woman struggles with vivid, disturbing nightmares that leave her detached and unable to live a normal life. After being introduced to the leader of a cult, she is led on a twisted journey of waking dreams that will begin to unravel the fabric of reality. This film is loaded to the brim with atmosphere. It is set in winter and contributes a ton of moody visuals, fantastic lighting, and a solid score. The script is also very psychological because it incorporates dream logic (or lack thereof) where it is uncertain as to what is a dream, what is reality, and how the two impact one another. I found it to be fascinating and well-crafted on that level. From the director of "Baskin", which also means that you get a bit of bloody violence.

Strongly recommended.
+3

๐Ÿ“ Reply to Post


  1000

๐Ÿ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

one of those plonkers ๐ŸŒ โš ๏ธ NSFW
Your favorite non-horror Halloween movies

Halloween and horror go together hand in hand, but not all stuff with Halloween is horror. Sometimes, they go a very family-friendly route with that shit. We have the upcoming Goosebumps movie, for example. It's set on Halloween, hence the subtitle "Haunted Halloween", but it's kind of impossible for a movie to be family-friendly AND horror, don't you think?

I watched Eli Roth's new movie The House with a Clock in its Walls recently, and like most of you, I was wondering how Eli Roth could make a movie PG. Now, I'll admit, I think Eli Roth is a cool motherfucker, and I've enjoyed all of his movies. He made this new movie based on some book, and I guess that could explain enough, but HE still made it, and while it tries to be horror-ish, it never really gets there.

It might be that kind of situation like with Robert Rodriguez, who made some gnarly movies, then made some shitty movies like Spy Kids, because he wanted something his kids could enjoy. I don't think Eli Roth has any kids, but what do I know? But either way, the movie was alright, but I couldn't quite say it's a horror movie myself.


Not that any of that matters. Just going on a rant here, and we need a bit of context for that. I was thinking about Kenny and Company (1976), Don Coscarelli's pre-Phantasm debut, which has a few familiar faces in what is generally a casual family film. Nothing great about it, but I do like it, as well as the few scenes that occur during Halloween night.

Donnie Darko (2001) is another one that has a plot centered around Halloween, or when the world is going to end. The movie is set in October, and leads up to the alleged date, where shit happens, and then... doesn't, apparently? I like the movie. I didn't at first, but it's grown on me, mostly because Patrick Swayze playing a pedophile is unique. This again prompts the curiosity about whether or not a dark(o) and gritty movie set on Halloween is or isn't a horror movie. I don't think Donnie is a horror movie though. Just weird.

The Crow (1994) is centered around Devils Night (October 30th) and is basically a Halloween movie, but not quite horror. Same goes for the sequel, which is mostly centered around the Day of the Dead.

Then, you have straight up family-friendly Halloween movies, like Nightmare Before Christmas, Hocus Pocus, The Halloween Tree, Ernest Scared Stupid, etc.



Do you have any thoughts on non-horror Halloween movies, or do you just stick with the horror ones? Can a family-friendly movie be horror? What are your thoughts on this mess?
+2

๐Ÿ“ Reply to Post


  1000

๐Ÿ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

one of those plonkers ๐ŸŒ โš ๏ธ NSFW
How much Halloween spirit do you have?

Surprisingly, I don't have that much. I love the season, I love seeing all the Halloween sales in stores, the specials on tv (hell, Robert Englund is coming back as Freddy for a tv special this year, for fuck's sake!), and I love that horror movies crawl out of the woodwork. I love that this day can decorate an entire month, but do I do much about it? Not really.

I usually don't do anything out of the ordinary on October 31st, because I get drunk and watch horror movies year round. But I still love that everyone else is embracing it more so than I am, and it gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling inside.

This year will be my first Halloween at a house in a while. I've been living in apartments for the past several years, and those aren't condusive to seasonal shennanigans as much as a suburban house, where you'll get trick-or-treaters. I'm a bit excited about that aspect of it. I can decorate this year. Probably mostly autumn stuff, with a little bit of "halloween" specific imagery, but it's still something I know I ought to do, but I'm a bit clueless, seeing as how I haven't decorated since I was a kid.

Another good thing is that I can help force tradition on my nephews, which gives me a better excuse to carve pumpkins and trick or treat with them (and steal their good candy).



I understand that some of you around the world don't celebrate Halloween as much as in the states (and some of us in the states barely celebrate it, for shame), but surely, the spirit of these festivities must bleed over, at least a little bit.

So what about you? What does Halloween mean to you, and what do you do to celebrate your Halloween spirit?
+8

๐Ÿ“ Reply to Post


  1000

๐Ÿ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Trash Person ๐ŸŒ โš ๏ธ NSFW
What movies did you buy or watch this week? (9-24)

Last few nights I've watched The Strange Ones and Spinning Man. Neither really qualify as horror, and neither are very good.

I've also preordered Trilogy of Terror, Perversion Story, Leonor and What have they Done to Your Daughters.

๐Ÿ“ Reply to Post


  1000

๐Ÿ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Existentialist * ๐ŸŒ โš ๏ธ NSFW
My latest purchases

Well... I have gone on another splurge this week.

These are what I came away with (right in time for the challenge too!):

bought:

Ju-On: The Grudge 2 (2003)
The Eye (2002)
The Eye 2 (2004)
Shutter (2004)
Dark Water (2002)
The War of the Worlds (1953)
The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951)
Return of the Living Dead III (1993)
Deliver Us from Evil (2014)
The House of the Devil (2009)
The Enfield Haunting (TV Mini-Series 2015)
Frankenstein (2015)
Jessabelle (2014)
The Mummy (1932)/Creature From The Black Lagoon(1954) - two film collectors edition.
The Wolf Man (1941)/Werewolf Of London (1935) - two film collectors edition.


rented (from local library):

The Martian (2015)
Truth or Dare (2018)
Alien: Covenant (2017)
The Girl with All the Gifts (2016)
The Dark Tower (2017)
Dracula - The Legacy Collection (Dracula / Dracula's Daughter / Son of Dracula / House of Dracula/House of Frankenstein)

Anyone have any thoughts on these?
+2

๐Ÿ“ Reply to Post


  1000

๐Ÿ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Trash Idiot ๐ŸŒ โš ๏ธ NSFW
Doom House 2003

Really fucking stupid no budget horror short

youtube
+1

๐Ÿ“ Reply to Post


  1000

๐Ÿ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Existentialist ๐ŸŒ โš ๏ธ NSFW
They Shoot Zombies, Don't They?

So I stumbled upon this remarkable project - a list of the 1,000 Greatest Horror Films implemented with a weighting system that allows a representation of the best that the horror genre has to offer. Some dedicated (kudos to him) fan of the horror genre created it and the list has grown in popularity over the last few years with a new edition for every year being released.

Now, I don't pretend to comprehend the system devised to come up with this list, and I won't debate it's authenticity, or reliability - not for 1,000 films. However, I feel this is a acceptable resource, and a strong basis of a wide range of what the horror genre has to offer.

Anyone ever heard about this list? How many have you seen?

(I have seen 590 btw)

https://www.imdb.com/list/ls026616000/

https://letterboxd.com/jhillman/list/they-shoot-zombies-dont-they-the-1000-greatest-3/

https://theyshootzombies.com/ghf1000/
+2

๐Ÿ“ Reply to Post


  1000

๐Ÿ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Trash Person ๐ŸŒ โš ๏ธ NSFW
What movies did you buy or watch this week? (10-1)

Bent 0/10
What Have They Done to Your Daughters 8/10
Marrowbone 0/10

๐Ÿ“ Reply to Post


  1000

๐Ÿ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

Lazy Person ๐ŸŒ โš ๏ธ NSFW
Body Snatcher Movies

image I recently watched The Faculty for the countless time. I've always been a fan of that movie. Back in 1998, I was 11, not a fan of most horror, and I didn't know shit about sci-fi outside of The X-Files. Something about The Faculty appealed to me however. Was it the cast and characters? The late '90s music? The school setting I could sort of relate to? The body snatcher scenario? These days, the last one's definitely a big part of the appeal. It adds something interesting to the movie. The main characters, high schoolers already struggling to get along due to their social differences, don't know who's an alien or who to trust.

When you read the title of this thread, you probably thought I would be talking about the Invasion of the Body Snatchers movies. Well, I am, in a moment. But I used that title because I'm not sure what else to call these movies. In Invasion of the Body Snatchers, the aliens are usually referred to as pod people, but that doesn't fit something like The Faculty. That's more of a parasite. As far as I know, there isn't really a sci-fi sub-genre for this. Maybe there should be.

There are four Invasion of the Body Snatchers movies: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956), Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978), Body Snatchers (1993), and The Invasion (2007). They're based on the novel The Body Snatchers (1955) by Jack Finney, which I haven't read. The Faculty is of course a homage to (Invasion of) the Body Snatchers and there's even a direct reference in the dialogue.

image I like the first three adaptations a lot and The Invasion is okay. They almost feel like they could be sequels that take place at the same time due to the different locations. 1956 is in the small town of Santa Mira, 1978 is in San Francisco, 1993 is at a military base in Alabama, and 2007 is in Washington, DC. Plus the lead actor from the 1956 version appears in the 1978 version playing basically the same character. There are differences that make it improbable that they're actually meant to be connected outside of their source material, but that hasn't stopped me from watching the first three together a few times before.

The Thing (1982) and its 2011 prequel could be considered body snatcher movies. Much like the other movies mentioned so far, it involves characters who don't know who's an alien. The blood test scene in the 1982 movie is well-known by now. I remember South Park spoofing it one time and I'm sure it inspired the similar test in The Faculty. I haven't seen The Thing from Another World in a long time, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't involve any body snatching. I also haven't read the novella the three movies are based on, Who Goes There? (1938) by John W. Campbell, Jr.

The novel The Puppet Masters (1951) by Robert A. Heinlein features some body snatching. For a change, I've read the book and haven't seen the 1994 movie. In the first Men in Black, I remember the alien antagonist basically wearing a human, except the skin didn't fit correctly and sagged.

image These are all the body snatcher movies that come to mind right now. I think it's a fun concept that hasn't been done to death, yet. While all the movies I mentioned involve aliens doing the body snatching, I suppose it could be another invading force. Maybe some mutated plant or insect already on Earth.

I have no doubt there are other body snatcher movies out there. Feel free to list them and any other thoughts you have about this.
+4

๐Ÿ“ Reply to Post


  1000

๐Ÿ” Repost

What would you like to do with this post?

1 ... 198 199 200 ... 345   3443 results