Return of the Living Dead II or.....C'mon, Sequels Need Love 2
OK, I'm not a complete moron (a half moron, yes) so I gather most folks don't like that the scales tip more toward comedy this time around, and that, after the absolute classic the first is, that chances are a sequel was just gonna pale in comparison.
But hear me out (read me out)
I've made it very clear (annoyingly so, I'm sure) that I'm a ROTLD fanatic. I think about that movie or some facet of that movie at least once a week. However, ROTLD 2 means nearly as much to me, but perhaps more for nostalgic reasons than anything. It was the first horror movie I ever saw in the theater. It scared the everliving piss outta me. I didn't see the original until a few years after that, but the way I see it, part 2 has always been a great companion piece to the first. Ok, I realize I could come off as being bias.
I watched it a few nights ago so that's why I'm writing this. I still love the movie. It has a lot to like in it and when I see people bashing it it does leave me scratching my head.
For starters, I think the movie is actually a bit creepier than its rep suggests. Yeah, there are some pretty hokey comedy bits thrown in, but when the film does want to scare you, I think it does an admirable job. Tarman 2.0 surprisingly outdoes the original Tarman, lookin' like an animated glob of molasses from hell. Another part that kinda sends a chill down your spine (if you allow it to) is when a zombie tries to trick our cast of characters into "coming to the hospital" but is outed upon answering Harry Truman after being asked who is the current US president.
Special fx, blood, zombie make-up and pus are better than ever, and perhaps in some ways even ickier and more elaborate than the original. But of course, that doesn't necessarily make the movie. It's just icing on the cake. Musical score? If we're talking the original score and not....whatever the shit we hear on the WB DVD is...is memorable, distinct, lively and with loads of personality. This is no dull score. Music can make or break a movie, in my opinion.
The pacing is nuts. Seriously, it's some of the zaniest, wildest, most delerious pacing in any movie ever. Broad claim, but I think it's true. This bad boy starts with a bang almost immediately and never lets up. The scene where our cast of heroes all first meet up at Jesse's house, deal with the decapitated zombie head ("get that damn screwdriver, OUT of mah head!"), go to Doc Mandel's house (best character in the movie) to get his car and play hot potato with a zombie's severed hand is exactly what I'm talking about: it's so over the top and fun, it tickles my movie-loving pickle in all the right places.
I'm not expecting to change anyone's opinion, just voicing my own and some of the reasons why I think this sequel is rather underrated. It isn't bad. It just isn't the original. The re-casting of Thom Matthews and James Karen in different roles was always a neat touch, despite the fact that Mr. Karen was given better lines (and probably better direction) as Burt in the original. Linnea Quigley (and her, um, quiggleys) are sorely missing, but we have one of my favorite ultimate 80s chicks Suzanne Snyder instead playing the bitchy hair metal girlfriend lookin' like she'd rather be on the set of the new Whitesnake video. The music is pretty good too, with some Robert Palmer tunes, a great opening song by Julian Cope that really sets the tone, and a cool party remix of Monster Mash to close out the film. Anthrax even sneaks in, though you'd have to have a good ear to catch their ode to Cliff Burton being snuck in.
All in all, love, love, love it.
๐ My Feed
โ๏ธ โ๏ธ Add Post
โ๏ธ ๐๏ธ Markup
Posts and comments support the following markup:
- **bold**
- *italic*
- ~~strikethrough~~
- [u]underline[/u]
- [color=red]red text[/color]
- @username (limit 10)
- #hashtag (limit 10)
โ๏ธ ๐๏ธ Preview
โ๏ธ ๐ Reply to Post
โ๏ธ ๐ Repost
What would you like to do with this post?
Lovecraftian Douglas Adams
I was just thinking about something from the Douglas Adams book Life, The Universe, And Everything. There's a part about a guy named Prak who was supposed to be some kind of witness in a big legal case. They gave him a truth serum to ensure that he didn't BS them, and they made him swear to tell "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." But, the problem was, someone bumped into the medic administering the truth serum, so he got WAAAYYYYY too big of a dose.
Somehow, the truth serum did something to his "doors of perception," and he was able to perceive the entire Truth about the whole universe. So, when they told him to start telling the truth, he just started talking, and revealing the darkest secrets about the true nature of the universe, and he JUST COULDN'T STOP. The people who were in the courtroom with him mostly went crazy, or killed themselves, from the shock and horror of all that Truth.
I was just thinking, what a Lovecraftian story that is! How does that Lovecraft quote go... it's something like "the most merciful thing in the universe is the inability of the tiny human mind to correlate and understand the true reality of the cosmos." Lovecraft had a real thing about the possible age of the universe, as many of us here know. Instead of it being five or six thousand years old, as it says in the Bible, Lovecraft was very interested in the universe being "vigintillions" of years old. I'm pretty sure no one thinks it's that old today, the consensus seems to be that it's about thirteen billion years old.
But, the thing is, that idea that knowledge of the true insignificance of mankind would be enough to drive us all absolutely out of our minds, if we spent much time thinking about it.... it's just a very Lovecraftian idea. I don't think I've ever really thought about that before.
If you want to google this, try googling Prak Argabuthon truth, not in quotes. That should do it.
I was just thinking about something from the Douglas Adams book Life, The Universe, And Everything. There's a part about a guy named Prak who was supposed to be some kind of witness in a big legal case. They gave him a truth serum to ensure that he didn't BS them, and they made him swear to tell "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." But, the problem was, someone bumped into the medic administering the truth serum, so he got WAAAYYYYY too big of a dose.
Somehow, the truth serum did something to his "doors of perception," and he was able to perceive the entire Truth about the whole universe. So, when they told him to start telling the truth, he just started talking, and revealing the darkest secrets about the true nature of the universe, and he JUST COULDN'T STOP. The people who were in the courtroom with him mostly went crazy, or killed themselves, from the shock and horror of all that Truth.
I was just thinking, what a Lovecraftian story that is! How does that Lovecraft quote go... it's something like "the most merciful thing in the universe is the inability of the tiny human mind to correlate and understand the true reality of the cosmos." Lovecraft had a real thing about the possible age of the universe, as many of us here know. Instead of it being five or six thousand years old, as it says in the Bible, Lovecraft was very interested in the universe being "vigintillions" of years old. I'm pretty sure no one thinks it's that old today, the consensus seems to be that it's about thirteen billion years old.
But, the thing is, that idea that knowledge of the true insignificance of mankind would be enough to drive us all absolutely out of our minds, if we spent much time thinking about it.... it's just a very Lovecraftian idea. I don't think I've ever really thought about that before.
If you want to google this, try googling Prak Argabuthon truth, not in quotes. That should do it.
โ๏ธ ๐ Reply to Post
โ๏ธ ๐ Repost
What would you like to do with this post?
An animal? AN ANIMAL?!
That is the stupidest thing I ever heard! Jesus Christ...
I don't know, Scotty. An animal in the basement of a secluded cabin in the woods in the middle of fucking nowhere doesn't sound all that implausible to me.
And then a minute later he's all like "yeah, you're probably right. It's probably just some animal."
What the fuck is this guy's deal?
That is the stupidest thing I ever heard! Jesus Christ...
I don't know, Scotty. An animal in the basement of a secluded cabin in the woods in the middle of fucking nowhere doesn't sound all that implausible to me.
And then a minute later he's all like "yeah, you're probably right. It's probably just some animal."
What the fuck is this guy's deal?
โ๏ธ ๐ Reply to Post
โ๏ธ ๐ Repost
What would you like to do with this post?
Iron Man 2 and 3, parallels with the Lethal Weapon movies
Wasn't there a thread about this already? Maybe I posted something in the shout box. Anyway, I'm just thinking about this subject. Iron Man 2 has a LOT of stuff drawn from Lethal Weapon 2, especially the ending in the shipyard. Iron Man 3, which I have on right now, has a scene that is like a combination of scenes from Lethal Weapon 1 and 2. It combines the scene where the helicopter attacks Tom Atkins' house, in Lethal Weapon 1, with the scene where Riggs and Murtaugh destor the house on stilts, in LW2. I bet there are other things... I remember noticing a bunch of them one time, not too long ago. Possibly within thelast six months or so.
Anyway, had to share. Try watching the first two Lethal Weapon movies and Iron Man 2 and 3 within a few days sometimes, and see if you notice anything else.
Wasn't there a thread about this already? Maybe I posted something in the shout box. Anyway, I'm just thinking about this subject. Iron Man 2 has a LOT of stuff drawn from Lethal Weapon 2, especially the ending in the shipyard. Iron Man 3, which I have on right now, has a scene that is like a combination of scenes from Lethal Weapon 1 and 2. It combines the scene where the helicopter attacks Tom Atkins' house, in Lethal Weapon 1, with the scene where Riggs and Murtaugh destor the house on stilts, in LW2. I bet there are other things... I remember noticing a bunch of them one time, not too long ago. Possibly within thelast six months or so.
Anyway, had to share. Try watching the first two Lethal Weapon movies and Iron Man 2 and 3 within a few days sometimes, and see if you notice anything else.
โ๏ธ ๐ Reply to Post
โ๏ธ ๐ Repost
What would you like to do with this post?
Terrifier
This is a pretty new clown/slasher movie that came onto netflix recently, and it had a bit of hype to it, so I went for it. It's got a throwback look to it, excessive gore, decent characters, and of course... one hell of a villain.
He's basically just a black and white painted mime, but he looks creepy enough, and has a big nose and bloody teeth, because he eats people's faces and whatnot... wears people's skin and hair... you know, whatever floats his boat. He'll brutally murder someone one second, then ride a tiny tricycle for laughs.
Most of the movie is dark and twisted, and while the plot isn't anything special, the execution and pacing are great. It isn't a long movie, and once it starts, it doesn't let up. Still, you know you're a sick fuck when you find some of his antics funny.
I kinda predicted the ending, but it's still a pretty good way to go out. I wouldn't be surprised if we saw more Terrifier movies. It looks like franchise material.
This is a pretty new clown/slasher movie that came onto netflix recently, and it had a bit of hype to it, so I went for it. It's got a throwback look to it, excessive gore, decent characters, and of course... one hell of a villain.
He's basically just a black and white painted mime, but he looks creepy enough, and has a big nose and bloody teeth, because he eats people's faces and whatnot... wears people's skin and hair... you know, whatever floats his boat. He'll brutally murder someone one second, then ride a tiny tricycle for laughs.
Most of the movie is dark and twisted, and while the plot isn't anything special, the execution and pacing are great. It isn't a long movie, and once it starts, it doesn't let up. Still, you know you're a sick fuck when you find some of his antics funny.
I kinda predicted the ending, but it's still a pretty good way to go out. I wouldn't be surprised if we saw more Terrifier movies. It looks like franchise material.
โ๏ธ ๐ Reply to Post
โ๏ธ ๐ Repost
What would you like to do with this post?
Valentines Day...
Hmmm right, so I figured in honor of the holiday why not show the soft underbelly of VPIR and create a post asking your top 3 chick flicks/romance type of films. Not a fan of the genre but I have been forced/coerced at times by lady friends to watch films of the sort in the past and not only did I end up liking these films, I'm man enough to admit they made me misty in the process. Go ahead, call me super 80s ghey in the replies and list your 3...here's mine.
1) Million Dollar Hotel (2000)
2) Amelie (2001)
3) Untamed Heart (1993)
Hmmm right, so I figured in honor of the holiday why not show the soft underbelly of VPIR and create a post asking your top 3 chick flicks/romance type of films. Not a fan of the genre but I have been forced/coerced at times by lady friends to watch films of the sort in the past and not only did I end up liking these films, I'm man enough to admit they made me misty in the process. Go ahead, call me super 80s ghey in the replies and list your 3...here's mine.
1) Million Dollar Hotel (2000)
2) Amelie (2001)
3) Untamed Heart (1993)
โ๏ธ ๐ Reply to Post
โ๏ธ ๐ Repost
What would you like to do with this post?
Deadly Blessing (1981)
This movie is available on Tubi right now. That's where I saw it.
It's an early-ish Wes Craven movie, and, um.... well, it's complicated. It's hard to know exactly what to say about it.
You can tell from the background music, the way everybody dresses, and their hair, that this movie comes out of the late 70s. It might have laid some of the groundwork for Children of the Corn, but it just has major 70s vibes throughout. One of the main characters, played by babe Maren Jensen, reminds me a LOT of Amy Irving in The Fury.
It's basically a story about a young couple who live in a farmhouse, mostly surrounded by neighbors who belong to some kind of religious sect called the Hittites. (The real Hittites were an ancient civilization in what we call Turkey today. I think maybe Wes Craven wanted to have the sect be Hutterites, but he didn't want to get sued, so he just changed the name a little). Anyway, the sect is a lot like the Amish or Mennonites. If that's what you expect to see, your expectations will be about right.
They are led by their stern, intolerant pastor, played by Ernest Borgnine. Throughout the movie, he comes across as an antagonist, and generally an unsympathetic bad guy. But, don't get too judgy, because... well, just don't.
The sect is always talking about something called the Incubus, which is some kind of demon that they think is threatening everybody's souls.
Maren Jensen has some sort of past history from the world outside of the rural farming area where the story is set. Early in the film, a couple of her old friends come to visit. One of them is played by Sharon Stone! It's her first movie where she talks. She looks so young. Anyway, they show up to visit, shortly after Maren J's character's husband, who is a former Hittite, gets mysteriously killed in a tractor accident.
There are other characters in the movie, people who aren't in the Hittite sect. Various people seem to really hate each other, so you might get the feeling there could be some violence and murder in this movie. And, well, yah, you shouldn't rule that out.
So, what can I say without wrecking it. Well, for me, it was a little too complicated, and it didn't quite come together enough to really make sense. I suspect that Wes Craven had a solid master plan, but somehow it was interfered with... maybe he ran out of money halfway through, or an important cast member got sick or injured, or studio higher-ups got involved and made him film things in some way that veered away from his master plan. It must be something like that, some random thing that messed with his plan. I just don't think Wes C would make a movie that makes this little sense.
It does have scary moments. Also, it is kind of worth seeing just to see a movie that co-stars Ernest
Borgnine, Sharon Stone, and Michael Berryman... that sounds so strange, to think of them together in one movie. It also has hints of a Rosemary's Baby or The Omen -ish type of plot or subplot, possibly left over from an early draft of the script. Or maybe that was Wes C's intention, from the beginning, to film a sort of Amish Omen movie, but for whatever reason he had to veer away from his plan.
Anyway, it could be worth seeing if you feel like speculating about what might have gone wrong filming it, or if you are in the mood to see some babes. But, I can't really give it two thumbs up.
There you have it.
This movie is available on Tubi right now. That's where I saw it.
It's an early-ish Wes Craven movie, and, um.... well, it's complicated. It's hard to know exactly what to say about it.
You can tell from the background music, the way everybody dresses, and their hair, that this movie comes out of the late 70s. It might have laid some of the groundwork for Children of the Corn, but it just has major 70s vibes throughout. One of the main characters, played by babe Maren Jensen, reminds me a LOT of Amy Irving in The Fury.
It's basically a story about a young couple who live in a farmhouse, mostly surrounded by neighbors who belong to some kind of religious sect called the Hittites. (The real Hittites were an ancient civilization in what we call Turkey today. I think maybe Wes Craven wanted to have the sect be Hutterites, but he didn't want to get sued, so he just changed the name a little). Anyway, the sect is a lot like the Amish or Mennonites. If that's what you expect to see, your expectations will be about right.
They are led by their stern, intolerant pastor, played by Ernest Borgnine. Throughout the movie, he comes across as an antagonist, and generally an unsympathetic bad guy. But, don't get too judgy, because... well, just don't.
The sect is always talking about something called the Incubus, which is some kind of demon that they think is threatening everybody's souls.
Maren Jensen has some sort of past history from the world outside of the rural farming area where the story is set. Early in the film, a couple of her old friends come to visit. One of them is played by Sharon Stone! It's her first movie where she talks. She looks so young. Anyway, they show up to visit, shortly after Maren J's character's husband, who is a former Hittite, gets mysteriously killed in a tractor accident.
There are other characters in the movie, people who aren't in the Hittite sect. Various people seem to really hate each other, so you might get the feeling there could be some violence and murder in this movie. And, well, yah, you shouldn't rule that out.
So, what can I say without wrecking it. Well, for me, it was a little too complicated, and it didn't quite come together enough to really make sense. I suspect that Wes Craven had a solid master plan, but somehow it was interfered with... maybe he ran out of money halfway through, or an important cast member got sick or injured, or studio higher-ups got involved and made him film things in some way that veered away from his master plan. It must be something like that, some random thing that messed with his plan. I just don't think Wes C would make a movie that makes this little sense.
It does have scary moments. Also, it is kind of worth seeing just to see a movie that co-stars Ernest
Borgnine, Sharon Stone, and Michael Berryman... that sounds so strange, to think of them together in one movie. It also has hints of a Rosemary's Baby or The Omen -ish type of plot or subplot, possibly left over from an early draft of the script. Or maybe that was Wes C's intention, from the beginning, to film a sort of Amish Omen movie, but for whatever reason he had to veer away from his plan.
Anyway, it could be worth seeing if you feel like speculating about what might have gone wrong filming it, or if you are in the mood to see some babes. But, I can't really give it two thumbs up.
There you have it.
โ๏ธ ๐ Reply to Post
โ๏ธ ๐ Repost
What would you like to do with this post?
Infinity Pool
I really liked this sci-fi horror. Dark, creepy and surprisingly unpredictable.
I really liked this sci-fi horror. Dark, creepy and surprisingly unpredictable.
โ๏ธ ๐ Reply to Post
โ๏ธ ๐ Repost
What would you like to do with this post?
Superbowl Trailers
Because let's face it, that's the most interesting part about the superbowl to those who don't give a shit about sports, so what have we gotten out of it so far?
Indy 5 looks all right. It looks like Karen Allen is coming back, and Indy is still fighting Nazis. What more do you need? He's still got it.
Guardians of the Galaxy 3 looks all right. Trying to take on a dramatic angle with the hint that it'll be a downer ending, which I'm all for. Plus, it was great to hear that Rainbow song "Since You Been Gone".
But the most interesting is a DC movie. The Flash looks pretty good. Very vivid with its special effects, but damn, it's good to see Keaton again. And with all this timeline fuckery, we're getting some Batfleck and even some General Zod? They said this movie had some great early reviews, so one can only hope they wrap up the Synderverse stuff accordingly. I'm probably wrong here, but he wants to save a specific universe because his mom lives there, but was it Keaton's universe that doesn't have the metahumans? Or is this an alternate universe from Keaton's Batman that merely features a Keaton Batman? So many questions...
There's supposed to be a Scream 6 trailer too. I bet they give the whole movie away in that one.
Because let's face it, that's the most interesting part about the superbowl to those who don't give a shit about sports, so what have we gotten out of it so far?
Indy 5 looks all right. It looks like Karen Allen is coming back, and Indy is still fighting Nazis. What more do you need? He's still got it.
Guardians of the Galaxy 3 looks all right. Trying to take on a dramatic angle with the hint that it'll be a downer ending, which I'm all for. Plus, it was great to hear that Rainbow song "Since You Been Gone".
But the most interesting is a DC movie. The Flash looks pretty good. Very vivid with its special effects, but damn, it's good to see Keaton again. And with all this timeline fuckery, we're getting some Batfleck and even some General Zod? They said this movie had some great early reviews, so one can only hope they wrap up the Synderverse stuff accordingly. I'm probably wrong here, but he wants to save a specific universe because his mom lives there, but was it Keaton's universe that doesn't have the metahumans? Or is this an alternate universe from Keaton's Batman that merely features a Keaton Batman? So many questions...
There's supposed to be a Scream 6 trailer too. I bet they give the whole movie away in that one.
โ๏ธ ๐ Reply to Post
โ๏ธ ๐ Repost
What would you like to do with this post?
Stop, drop, and roll!
I have seen thousands of people in movies catch on fire. But you know what I've never seen? One of these flaming motherfuckers stop, drop, and roll! Holy shit! This is basic stuff, people! I remember this information being pounded into my skull practically every day all throughout grade school. If you ever catch on fire, what do you do? STOP, DROP, AND FUCKING ROLL! They said it so much that I believed it was an inevitable part of life that I would one day catch on fire.
And here I am, totally prepared, but with nothing to show for it. But every single person I have ever seen catch on fire in a movie just runs around flailing their arms. WTF?! That's the LAST thing you're supposed to do! Sometimes they're even right next to a body of water! And do they ever jump in? FUCK NO! I can only figure fire safety is a completely unheard of concept in the movie world.
I have seen thousands of people in movies catch on fire. But you know what I've never seen? One of these flaming motherfuckers stop, drop, and roll! Holy shit! This is basic stuff, people! I remember this information being pounded into my skull practically every day all throughout grade school. If you ever catch on fire, what do you do? STOP, DROP, AND FUCKING ROLL! They said it so much that I believed it was an inevitable part of life that I would one day catch on fire.
And here I am, totally prepared, but with nothing to show for it. But every single person I have ever seen catch on fire in a movie just runs around flailing their arms. WTF?! That's the LAST thing you're supposed to do! Sometimes they're even right next to a body of water! And do they ever jump in? FUCK NO! I can only figure fire safety is a completely unheard of concept in the movie world.
โ๏ธ ๐ Reply to Post
โ๏ธ ๐ Repost
What would you like to do with this post?